US Politics and News
Anyone Remember What's In The Health Care Bill?
Palin On Her Palm Notes: God Did It Too (VIDEO)
The end of the road for Barack Obama?
Was Waxman-Markey A Waste of Energy?
In early March, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) dropped some surprising news: The effort to tackle global warming via a cap-and-trade scheme is officially "dead." Graham, John Kerry (D-Mass.), and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will soon release details of an alternative plan for a bill to curb carbon emissions, which is expected to cobble together policy proposals from various lawmakers in the hopes of picking up a filibuster-proof 60 supporters. So, where does that leave the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation that squeaked through the House last summer by a single vote after months of convoluted dealmaking? No one really knows—and some House Democrats are none too happy about the Senate's change of direction.
For almost a decade, cap and trade has been viewed as the approach with the best shot of making it into law. The idea is that the government imposes a cap on polluters, and those companies who emit too much can buy permits from companies that produce less than their limit. Nearly a year ago, Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) introduced legislation to the House that sought to enact such a system. Months of torturous negotiations followed, in which major energy interests scrambled to grab a piece of the pie.
2 Comments | Post CommentFlorida to Deny Tax Breaks to Films w/ Gay Characters?
Funeral Flap: Justices Weigh Religion, Speech Rights
Roy Ashburn: 'I'm Gay'
Sarah Palin Crossed Border For Canadian Health Care
Eric Massa slams Democrat leaders for ethics probe
The New Jim Crow
This story first appeared on the TomDispatch website.
Ever since Barack Obama lifted his right hand and took his oath of office, pledging to serve the United States as its 44th president, ordinary people and their leaders around the globe have been celebrating our nation's "triumph over race." Obama's election has been touted as the final nail in the coffin of Jim Crow, the bookend placed on the history of racial caste in America.
Obama's mere presence in the Oval Office is offered as proof that "the land of the free" has finally made good on its promise of equality. There's an implicit yet undeniable message embedded in his appearance on the world stage: this is what freedom looks like; this is what democracy can do for you. If you are poor, marginalized, or relegated to an inferior caste, there is hope for you. Trust us. Trust our rules, laws, customs, and wars. You, too, can get to the promised land.
Perhaps greater lies have been told in the past century, but they can be counted on one hand. Racial caste is alive and well in America.
Most people don't like it when I say this. It makes them angry. In the "era of colorblindness" there's a nearly fanatical desire to cling to the myth that we as a nation have "moved beyond" race. Here are a few facts that run counter to that triumphant racial narrative:
7 Comments | Post CommentGraham to Obama: scrap N Y terror trial, I'll stand with you
Obama’s Nuclear Blind Spot
The Obama administration has embarked on a high-stakes gamble: devoting billions of dollars to an expansion of nuclear power in the hope of winning Republican votes for a climate bill. But in its eagerness to drum up bipartisan support for one of the hardest sells on Obama’s policy agenda, is the administration turning a blind eye to the financial risk?
Obama’s 2009 budget provides $54.4 billion in government-backed loans for new reactors—a long-cherished goal of nuclear advocates and their (mostly Republican) allies in Congress. Environmental and taxpayer protection groups oppose this plan—often citing a damning 2003 report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that assessed a similar proposed program and predicted that the loans would have a default rate of "well above 50 percent." The Department of Energy (DOE) argues that this study "is not germane to the current project" and says it has taken steps to avoid the financial pitfalls. But in interviews with Mother Jones, Obama administration officials refused to provide specific figures that would support their claim.
20 Comments | Post CommentDemocrats' Ethical Lapses Could Imperil Hold on Power
McClatchy Survey Finds 2 To 1 Support For Healthcare Reform
Obama looking to give new life to immigration reform
Harry Reid: Only 36,000 Lost Their Jobs Today
Obama Touts Green Jobs as Key to Recovery
1,200 Protest Against Budget Cuts at Schwarzenegger's Office
Scandals Break (and Break and Break) in New York
Senators: Lift Ban on Gays Donating Blood
Center for Democracy & Technology
- Protecting Privacy in Online Identity: A Review of the Letter and Spirit of the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s Application to Identity Providers
- CDT Testifies on Location Privacy
- The Role of Privacy by Design in Protecting Consumer Privacy
- CDT Files Two Sets of Comments to the FCC about the Importance of Privacy in the Context of the National Broadband Plan
- CDT Offers Recommendations For FCC “Open Internet” Rules